|

There
are those that would encourage you to support bans on the
breeding of pure breed dogs. They often argue that the professional
breeder, and the desire to own a pure breed dog or cat,
is the cause of pet over population. The following study
demonstrates that their claims are not based upon the known
facts.
The National Council on Pet Population
Study and Policy (NCPPSP) is a coalition of eleven of America's
foremost animal organizations concerned with the issue of
unwanted pets in the United States. It was established to
gather and analyze reliable data that further characterize
the number, origin, and disposition of companion animals
(dogs and cats) in the United States; to promote responsible
stewardship of these companion animals; and to then recommend
programs to reduce the number of surplus/unwanted pets in
the United States.
The Council is guided by five major goals:
- To serve as a national collection point for gathering
and evaluating pet population data and relevant materials;
- To facilitate effective communication among organizations,
associations, and institutions that share the Council's
mission;
- To provide expertise and resources for gathering and
analyzing needed data pertinent to the control of pet
populations;
- To establish timetables and strategies for reducing
the numbers of surplus dogs and cats in the U.S.;
- To obtain funding to support the Council's mission;
The Council has undertaken several important studies to
better understand the issue of unwanted companion animals.
This problem cannot be solved unless we truly understand
the problem. Without such data, individuals and organizations
will continue to describe the atrocities of pet population
issues, but will have no clear idea of how to approach those
issues effectively.
The
Council is composed of the following organizations:
- American Animal
Hospital Association
- American Humane
Association
- American Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- American Veterinary
Medical Association
- Association of
Teachers of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine
- Cat Fanciers
Association, Inc.
- The Humane Society
of the United States
- Massachusetts
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- National Animal
Control Association
- Society of Animal
Welfare Administrators
Summary of the Projects of the National
Council of Pet Population Study and Policy Since
the 1940's, "pet overpopulation" has been an important
issue to the animal welfare community. This surplus of animals
has resulted in millions of dogs and cats being euthanized
annually in animal shelters across the country. The nature
and scope of this problem have been notoriously difficult
to characterize. The number of animal shelters in the U.S.,
the demographics of the population of animals passing through
them and the characteristics of pet owners relinquishing
animals are poorly understood. What portion of these animals
are adopted or euthanized, why are they relinquished and
their source of acquisition are all questions for which
there have been little data.
In the 1970's, although no scientific research had been
done to characterize the nature of the problem, many articles
appeared in both scientific and popular press resulting
in the efforts undertaken to resolve the overpopulation
problem. The most prevalent belief at that time was that
most of the animals coming to shelters and subsequently
being euthanized were puppies and kittens, and that the
solution to the problem was to decrease the birth rate by
promoting aggressive spaying and neutering problems. Other
promoted a more comprehensive approach, encouraging a combination
of sterilization programs, enhanced pet owner education
and strict animal control legislation and enforcement. While
the number of sheltered animals being euthanized appears
to have declined over the past twenty years, it is still
unclear which, if any of these options has been most effective
or whether other factors, unrelated to intervention strategies
are responsible.
More data are clearly needed to characterize the pet surplus
in the United States. Different groups have attempted to
provide solutions, but have not coordinated their efforts
or provided adequate evaluation of the success of implemented
programs. The National Council on Pet Population Study and
Policy (NCPPSP) was created in 1993 to address these concerns
and coordinate three epidemiologcal studies: A) The Shelter
Statistics Survey-- developed to create and update a list
of all shelters and impoundment facilities in the U.S. and
collect statistics on the number of animals entering these
facilities and the disposition of these animals; B) The
Regional Shelter Relinquishment Survey-- designed to characterize
the animals entering these shelters and the population of
people relinquishing animals, and the reason for relinquishment;
and C) The National Household Survey-- designed to characterize
the population of pet owners and the acquisition, ownership
and disposition of pets.
A) The Shelter Statistics Survey:
This Survey, initiated in 1994, by the NCPPSP gathered
the names of shelters and organizations believed to be sheltering
animals. Member organizations of the NCPPSP Board were each
given existing shelter lists for five states for confirmation
and to contribute the names of shelters, associations, groups,
or agencies sheltering animals that were not on these lists.
Only shelters that housed more than 100 dogs and/or cats
each year were included. Approximately 4,700 shelters remained
after duplicates were purged. Names were continually added
and removed based on shelter response. The final list had
5,042 names. All responses were kept confidential.
Information linking the names of shelters with their responses
was not released.
A survey card was constructed requesting shelter name, address,
contact person and phone number. In addition, data were
requested for the number of dogs and cats entering the shelters
through animal control, owner relinquishment or other methods,
and for the number of dogs and cats exiting the shelters
through adoption, owner reclamation, euthanasia or other
methods. Kittens and puppies were counted in the cat and
dog categories, respectively. The data card was sent to
the initial list of shelters in February 1995 requesting
data for 1994. Reminder cards were sent out later that year.
Changes to the mailing list were continuously made in response
to shelter comments. The study has been repeated for 1995,
1996 and 1997. The following tabulated data were shared
with the agencies on the shelter list as they became available.
The collection of data by means of survey cards was halted
due to the low percentage of response by animal shelters.
| Types
of Responding Shelters (%) |
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
| Local governmental
animal care and control agency
| 53.1 |
46.1 |
38.3 |
| Private, non-profit
humane agency/shelter |
21.9 |
24.7 |
23 |
| Private, non-profit
humane agency/shelter w/ housing contract |
16 |
18.1 |
18.7 |
| Other |
9 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
| Unknown |
NA |
6.8 |
15.6 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Total Number
of responding shelters |
1100 |
1054 |
1038 |
Sources of Dogs and Cats Entering Reporting
Shelters
| |
Submitted by Animal
Control % |
| |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
| Dogs |
51.0 |
44.6 |
44.8 |
| Cats |
39.7 |
35.4 |
33.6 |
| Unspecified |
56.9 |
49.4 |
25.9 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Overall |
47.4 |
41.7 |
38.9 |
| |
Relinquished by
Owner % |
| |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
| Dogs |
27.7 |
21.3 |
26.5 |
| Cats |
35.1 |
34.9 |
32.2 |
| Unspecified |
18.2 |
20.2 |
18.3 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Overall |
29.3 |
29.3 |
28.9 |
| |
Other Sources % |
| |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
| Dogs |
21.3 |
10.4 |
13.5 |
| Cats |
25.2 |
13.6 |
19.2 |
| Unspecified |
24.9 |
9.5 |
18.1 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Overall |
23.3 |
11.5 |
16.2 |
| |
Unknown Sources
% |
| |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
| Dogs |
n/a |
17.7 |
15.1 |
| Cats |
n/a |
16.2 |
15.1 |
| Unspecified |
n/a |
20.9 |
37.8 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Overall |
n/a |
17.5 |
16.0 |
| |
Total Number |
| |
'94 |
'95 |
'96 |
| Dogs |
2,112,009 |
2,080,146 |
2,154,191 |
| Cats |
1,668,986 |
1,549,224 |
1,711,815 |
| Unspecified |
547,919 |
483,822 |
278,172 |
| |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
| Overall |
4,328,914 |
4,113,192 |
4,144,178 |
WHY DO PETS END UP IN
SHELTERS? STUDY FINDS THE TOP 10 REASONS FOR PET RELINQUISHMENT
Denver- Everyday in communities across
the US a bond is broken. It's the bond between people and
their pets, resulting in millions of pets being surrendered
to shelters each year. And little has been known about the
reasons until now.
In a recent study conducted by the National
Council on Pet Population and Policy (NCPPSP) and published
in the July issue of the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare
Science (JAAWS), researchers went into 12 selected animal
shelters in the United States for one year to find out why.
The results of the study show that the
top seven reasons for relinquishment for both dogs and cats
are the same. "These commonalties suggest that there
may be similar ways to address relinquishment in dogs and
cats," says Pam Burney, NCPPSP president. "For
people who work in a shelter all day, there isn't always
time to look at these issues. We have impressions of what's
happening, but now we have objective data that will help
develop specific programs to address the issues that have
been identified."
The Top Ten Reasons for Pet Relinquishment
to Shelters in the United States .
|
Dogs
- Moving
- Landlord not allowing pet
- Too many animals in household
- Cost of pet maintenance
- Owner having personal problems
- Inadequate facilities
- No homes available for litter mates
- Having no time for pet
- Pet Illness(es)
- Biting
|
Cats
- Moving
- Too many animals in household
- Landlord not allowing pet
- Cost of pet maintenance
- Owner having personal problems
- Inadequate facilities
- No homes available for litter mates
- Allergies in family
- House soiling
- Incompatibility with other pets
|
Specially trained researchers completed
confidential individual interviews with pet owners who were
relinquishing their dogs and cats to animal shelters. Pet
owners were allowed to give up to five reasons for relinquishment.
Interviewers did not, however, prioritize the responses.
They simply recorded them in the order stated.
Characteristics of Pets Being Relinquished
In addition to the reasons for relinquishment,
the study collected data on the pets being relinquished.
According to the study:
- The majority of surrendered dogs (47.7%) and cats (40.3%)
were between 5 months and 3 years of age.
- The majority of dogs (37.1%) and cats (30.2%) had been
owned from 7 month to 1 year.
- Approximately half of the pets (42.8% of dogs; 50.8%
of cats) surrendered were not neutered.
- Many of the pets relinquished (33% of dogs; 46.9% of
cats) had not been to a veterinarian.
- Animals acquired from friends were relinquished on higher
numbers (31.4% of dogs; 33.2% of cats) than from any other
source.
- Close to equal numbers of males and female dogs and
cats were surrendered.
- Most dogs (96%) had not received any obedience training.
- Less than (6%) of the animals relinquished appeared
to possibly be purebred.
- Less than (3%) of the animals euthanized appeared to
possibly be purebred.
Characteristics of Pets Owners Surrendering
Pets
During the confidential interviews, researchers also gathered
data on the people surrendering the pets. "Owners represented
a broad range of age, ethnicity, education, and income level,
indicating continued efforts will need to reach wide and
far into communities across the country," say Dr. Mo
Salman, he article's senior author.
The NCPPSP Regional Shelter Survey was designed, implemented,
and analyzed by six members of the NCPPSP Scientific Advisory
Committee. Regional investigators were encouraged to select
shelters that were likely to be representative of those
in their locations. The selection was also based on a shelter's
ability to dedicate time and resources to the project.
The publication of this article represents the first such
scientific and public release of relinquishment data from
the NCPPSP's ongoing research into pet population issues.
"The council has undertaken several important studies
to better understand the issue of unwanted companion animals.
This problem cannot be solved unless we truly understand
it," says Burney. "Without this new data, individuals
and organizations can have a clear idea of how to approach
these issues most effectively."
As with all research, there are limitations. According
to the authors, "the study was designed to describe
the animals submitted to shelters. Thus, this set of data
has no comparison data from the general pet-owning population.
Many factors undoubtedly influence relinquishment, and some
critical factors may have been omitted. This study represents
a beginning of systematic data collection to examine this
complex problem. The study is not designed to deal with
animals other than those entering shelters, and influences
cannot be drawn beyond this population."
back to top
|